"So this thing that purports to bring good and all must create a set A by itself within the universal set, setting shackling rules and constricting boundaries. that, as long as A does not equal to the universal set, continues to bring enmity (not by themselves, but by their own definitions) between the A and A', because by its very definition A and A' are opposites. To make it worse, there's not just A. There's also B, and then there's also C..."
"It's like a remote control. The one who had it no longer exists, and now and then, every one wants to have it. All the others, either they like the channel currently viewed by the one who has it, or they dislike it. To make it worse, there's 2000+ channels and they are growing."
"Trying to convince everyone that nobody can know or reason with absolute certainty if the big guy does exist is just as hard as NP complete problems, if not harder. To make it worse, they find the same feeling of you. I give up and move on and so should you."
"Matter constituents right down to the subatomic level invariably reorganize themselves from chaotic to uniform, no matter what the initial state is. This reverberates throughout the hierarchy, and there is no reason why a form, an object, a matter that perpetuates themselves through space and time should not have an organized form, and this includes the ill defined life forms. For a thing to be chaotic is to lose its original state and jump to another state with no apparent order, thus its identity shall not survive. This is a very basic principle and no one has to be responsible for that. Apologies for invoking the anthropic principle, but had this not hold true for a universe with a certain properties like that of ours, no one observer shall exist to ruminate on that, for no matter of certain narrow properties (that which we call the Goldilocks's zone) can create enough complexity to sustain it. We have no reason to ascribe such ordinary yet incredibly grand existence and the interactions therein to an entity whose origins can not be comprehended, for nothing can be determined with certitude should we decide to wend on this path. Everyone can say whatever they want, hence the existence of sets A,B,C... as explicated above. And therefore by Occam's Razor, it shall be discarded."
"The invocation of the Anthropic Principle requires no watchmaker if there is a watch. For time and space arises out of complex interactions of geometry and dimensions at incomprehensibly grand scale. At such scale, a multitude of events not comprehensible in the usual space-time sense are happening, and one of them leads to our universe, and irrevocably to our existence. Is there a control? No there is not. Our enormous desire to simplify such chaotic scene into one of patterns and forms has nevertheless deviates us from the correct reasoning, if we are never able to and decide to push all such incomprehensible matters to a single entity whom we form in the image of us, yet whose capability is extended to such infinite scale as to justify its ability to handle the matters of which responsibility we gladly give to."